The Bible makes many strange statements, often intentionally in order to provoke questions and thought. In ancient times, people would hold lively discussions and debates after listening to the precious, rare scrolls read aloud. What did they think after hearing from the prophet Isaiah that a woman who is “barren” or “unmarried” (lit., “desolate”) actually has many children? (Isa 54:1) What could Isaiah have possibly meant? What a very strange thing to say! And shouldn’t everyone have children? After all, God said, פרו ורבו (pru u’rvu): “be fruitful and multiply” (Gen 1:28).

The Talmud records many such ancient arguments and interpretations. The rabbis believed that “be fruitful and multiply” was not only a blessing, but an actual command. They therefore had to consider the question of how many children were required in order to satisfy the divine decree. They disagreed about this – and also about whether only sons were necessary, or daughters too. Some claimed that only men, not women, had to keep the commandment. And there was another very important question as well: What about people who are physically unable to have children or who remain unmarried?

The question was not a simple one. Some rabbis even declared, “Whoever has no children is considered like a dead person.” Their evidence? Genesis 30:1, where Rachel says, “Give me children, or else I am dead!” (Talmud, Nedarim 64b) Were the barren (sterile) and unmarried really just consigned to “desolation”? Other rabbis provided a solution: “Whoever teaches Torah to someone else’s son, the scripture ascribes him credit as if he begat him.” (Talmud, Sanhedrin 19b) Another option was to raise orphans (or adopt those lacking parents who could take care of them).

The texts in the Talmud were written down in about 200-500 CE/AD. In general, the ideas they express had developed out of the beliefs held by the Pharisees in the first century. One of the few identifiable Jews of that time to leave us his own writings is Shaul/Paul of Tarsus, who repeatedly called himself both a Pharisee and an emissary of Yeshua/Jesus. So what did he have to say about this question of overcoming childlessness? Shaul/Paul knew the verse in Isaiah; he even quoted it in one of his letters (Gal 4:27). Not only that, he himself apparently remained unmarried and had no biological children (see 1 Cor 7:8).

Yet, interestingly enough, Shaul/Paul talked very often about his “sons” and “children”! (See 1 Cor 4:14, 4:15, 4:17; 2 Cor 6:13; Gal 4:19; 1 Thess 2:7, 2:11; 1 Tim 1:2, 1:18; 2 Tim 1:2, 2:1; Titus 1:4; Philemon 1:10.). Who were these “children” of his? Why, of course, those people to whom he had taught the Jewish Scriptures (Torah)! Sometimes he even stressed and defended his claim to be their real “father” in the face of other teachers: “Even if you might have ten thousand teachers… I am the one who begat you!” (1 Cor 4:15) This is the same kind of language that we find later in the Talmud.

Today, almost 2,000 years later, it may be commonplace to hear people speak of “spiritual children” and the like. But how many know that the roots of this expression go back all the way to ancient discussions about Genesis and Isaiah? Understanding the original context and meaning of ancient writings often gives a very different perspective, even about questions we face today!

BEGIN YOUR JOURNEY OF DISCOVERY

14 COMMENTS

    • Darlene, can you perhaps explain what you mean? Note also that none of the texts I cited in the article uses the expression “spiritual children.” I just included that as a common saying that people may use today without thinking too much about it.

  1. This is very interesting. I have no grandchildren. I have witnessed my belief in the one true God and Messiah Yeshua when possible. I do not argue over dogma. Thank you for this lesson. Shalom.

  2. Shalom Dr. Gruber, I just wanted to comment on this. I have no children, not because I did not want any, because I did. But I could not have children because I had ovarian cysts when young and married to my husband. So what I have done is do like it says in the Tanakh and in the new testament in Galatians 4:27 where it says, Rejoice you barren woman who does not bear children; Break forth and shout you who are not in labor for the deserted will have more children than the one whose husband is with her.

    • [Part 1] Sandra, thank you for these comments! Indeed, that is the verse mentioned in the article (where Shaul/Paul quotes from the prophet Isaiah)…

  3. It also says this in Gen. 30:1. I am glad that I was not in Rachel’s place. I have learned to accept the fact that I could not have children, but I was able to help 10 foster kids. Of course I had 6 children and 7 dogs in the house. So you know that was fun to do. I had a 2 month old baby girl too, that I helped to bring the obruse out of what she had. She had diaper rash so bad her front and back side was red.

    • [Part 2] …What you have done sounds very noble and exactly like what these ancient texts suggested to do. It sounds like you do have actual children because of your compassionate choices!

  4. Frederick Nietzsche preferred, Progeny. No children but referred to his books on philosophy as progenies. As an inventor with 10 inventions, I concur

  5. The command of pru urvu was as I see it given to HaADaaM and other Patriarchs to preserve the Nation. Is the Hysterectomy, Vasectomy, abortion and use of condoms not all the same sin as that of Onan, reluctant to raise seed for someone else? Sin in breaking that command?

    • Thanks for the comment, Karel. Personally I would definitely not lump all these things together as one and the same.

  6. Hi Dr Gruber
    Maybe, as we are all God’s children (creation), we should be looking at the children of all nations as our own, teaching and treating them, as we would teach and treat our own biological sons and daughters

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your name here
Words left: 50
Please enter your comment!